Students learn basic anatomy and will begin to develop an understanding of the way a figure inhabits space; thus able to successfully reproduce this space in two dimensions. The goal of the course is to learn academic, realistic representation of the figure: Emphasis will be on accurately rendering the figure on the page in proper proportion. Students work up to developing a personal style within the confines of academic figurative art.
Master Near perfect reconstruction of master Curves give the composition a sensual quality
Figure Successful style match Tonal variations are executed extremely well I would have liked to see the abdominal lines curve in more, like they do in your master
Great job with your copy, I was glad that you “cropped” the original and then did the same in your second drawing, this brought the two together. Some of the areas in the second piece brilliantly captured qualities of the first, I would have liked to see this throughout. Both are beautifully rendered.
Your applied study alongside the master study seem to go hand-in-hand and would definitely work as a series. I would have mistaken your drawing as a study the artist himself had done—that is clearly how well you have captured his style. I would say to use perhaps slightly use more stark mark-making in the musculature of the figure just as the original one does (especially in the torso regions).
Your master copy is done very well. I really like that line quality. The master study is done very well and like it is close to being part of that series.
While not completely on point with the accuracy of marks, the style is very precise. Transition to drawing is great. It could go a little more loose, a little rounder.
You have done a very beautiful job using the same mark making as the master piece although I would like to see more exaggerated definition like your master uses.
Your master study was very well done, Your second drawing could have had a bit more of that rounded markings from your artists work, but overall very nice.
Master
ReplyDeleteNear perfect reconstruction of master
Curves give the composition a sensual quality
Figure
Successful style match
Tonal variations are executed extremely well
I would have liked to see the abdominal lines curve in more, like they do in your master
Great job with your copy, I was glad that you “cropped” the original and then did the same in your second drawing, this brought the two together. Some of the areas in the second piece brilliantly captured qualities of the first, I would have liked to see this throughout. Both are beautifully rendered.
ReplyDeleteYour applied study alongside the master study seem to go hand-in-hand and would definitely work as a series. I would have mistaken your drawing as a study the artist himself had done—that is clearly how well you have captured his style. I would say to use perhaps slightly use more stark mark-making in the musculature of the figure just as the original one does (especially in the torso regions).
ReplyDeleteYour master copy is done very well. I really like that line quality. The master study is done very well and like it is close to being part of that series.
ReplyDeleteGood structure and tonal variation in both pieces. Nice job. The original and student piece did work well together.
ReplyDeleteCould use a little bit more of a psychedelic touch, but overall the study is totally believable and consistent with the master work.
ReplyDeleteWhile not completely on point with the accuracy of marks, the style is very precise. Transition to drawing is great. It could go a little more loose, a little rounder.
ReplyDeleteYou have done a very beautiful job using the same mark making as the master piece although I would like to see more exaggerated definition like your master uses.
ReplyDeleteYour master study was very well done, Your second drawing could have had a bit more of that rounded markings from your artists work, but overall very nice.
ReplyDeleteThe stylistic differences totally make sense actually, because the study is of a male, so it should be less curvy and more masculine.
ReplyDelete